2024 BMW R 1300 GS vs KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 BMW R 1300 GS 85 cm Tallest seat here
- KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT 83 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 2 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 145 hp (2024 BMW R 1300 GS) up to 173 hp (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT).
- Torque spans 141 Nm (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT) up to 149 Nm (2024 BMW R 1300 GS).
- Weight spans 209 kg (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT) to 237 kg (2024 BMW R 1300 GS).
- Engine sizes are very close.
Reader votes so far — total 1: 2024 BMW R 1300 GS (0); KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT (1).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | BMW R 1300 GS | KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | BMW | KTM |
| Model | BMW R 1300 GS | KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT |
| Engine size | Above 1000cc | Above 1000cc |
| Power | 145hp | 173hp |
| Torque | 149nm. | 141nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves |
| Weight | 237kg | 209kg |
| Front brake | Dual disc brakes, semi-floating type brake discs, 310 mm diameter, 4-piston radial brake calipers. | 320mm Brembo four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc |
| Rear brake | Single disc brake, 285 mm diameter, 2-piston floating caliper | 240mm Brembo twin-piston fixed calliper, brake disc |
| Seat height (cm) | 85cm | 83cm |
| Front tyre | 120/70 x R19 | 120/70 17 |
| Rear tyre | 170/60 x R17 | 200/55 17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | BMW Motorrad EVO Telelever, handlebar tilt decoupling via flexible element, central suspension spring. | WP Semi-active suspension USD Ø 48 mm |
| Rear suspension | BMW Motorrad EVO Paralever, cast aluminum single-sided swingarm, swingarm pivot axle, central WAD spring connection, continuously adjustable spring preload. | WP SAT (semi-active technology) shock absorber |
| Motorcycle type | Adventure | Touring |
| Top speed | 240km/h | 260km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 19 L – 5 L/100km | 23 L – 6 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $18895 | $19799 |
| Brand price lists | View BMW price list | View KTM price list |
| Extra features | -BMW Motorrad Connectivity with TFT display Matrix LED headlights Daytime running lights Dynamic Traction Control (DTC) -BMW Motorrad Fully Integrated ABS Pro 4 riding modes (Eco, Rain, Road, Enduro) Hill Start Control (HSC) Dynamic Brake Control (DBC) -Dynamic Cruise Control (DCC) Motor drag torque control (MSR) Tire Pressure Control (RDC) Keyless Ride Heated grips Smartphone charging compartment with USB charging socket Handguard protection with integrated turn signal indicators |
-Euro5, Heated Grips, -Riding Modes 4 Different riding modes: Rain, Street, Sport, and Track -7 inch TFT Dashboard, Twin Ignition Technology, Slipper Clutch, Wind Shield |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 BMW R 1300 GS vs 2023 KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT: listed specifications
The 2024 BMW R 1300 GS and 2023 KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT are closely matched in displacement, while the R 1300 GS has more torque, and the 1290 SUPER DUKE GT has more peak power, and the higher listed top speed and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
R 1300 GS and 1290 SUPER DUKE GT have very similar engine displacement (1100 cc vs 1100 cc).
Peak power
1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a clear listed power advantage (173 hp vs 145 hp).
Torque
R 1300 GS has a modest listed torque advantage (149 Nm vs 141 Nm).
Listed top speed
1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a modest listed top-speed advantage (260 km/h vs 240 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
1290 SUPER DUKE GT is notably lighter on the listed weight (209 kg vs 237 kg). 1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a lower listed seat height (83 cm vs 85 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height, while displacement remains relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of BMW R 1300 GS vs KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT is listed at 260 km/h (162 mph) vs 240 km/h (149 mph) for BMW R 1300 GS.
Which has more horsepower, BMW R 1300 GS or KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT has 173 hp compared with 145 hp on the BMW R 1300 GS.
Which is lighter, BMW R 1300 GS or KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT is lighter at 209 kg vs 237 kg for BMW R 1300 GS.
Which is better, BMW R 1300 GS or KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
