2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR vs KAWASAKI Ninja 650

Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.

Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.

Technical score (estimate)

Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.

Top on paper
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR
85 pts
KAWASAKI Ninja 650
15 pts

Usage fit (estimate)

Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.

City / commute

2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR
28.7 pts
Best fit here
KAWASAKI Ninja 650
70.2 pts

Touring / long rides

Best fit here
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR
88.3 pts
KAWASAKI Ninja 650
14.3 pts

Sporty riding

Best fit here
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR
99 pts
KAWASAKI Ninja 650
25 pts

New rider friendly

2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR
7.3 pts
Best fit here
KAWASAKI Ninja 650
81.3 pts

Seat height (cm)

Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.

  • 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR 81 cm Tallest seat here
  • KAWASAKI Ninja 650 79 cm Lowest seat here

Spread in this comparison: about 2 cm.

Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).

Auto summary from specs

Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.

  • Power spans 68 hp (KAWASAKI Ninja 650) up to 95 hp (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR).
  • Torque spans 64 Nm (KAWASAKI Ninja 650) up to 75 Nm (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR).
  • Weight spans 193 kg (KAWASAKI Ninja 650) to 207 kg (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR).
  • Displacement spans 650 cc (KAWASAKI Ninja 650) to 800 cc (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR).
Specification QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR KAWASAKI Ninja 650
Brand QJMOTOR KAWASAKI
Model QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR KAWASAKI Ninja 650
Engine size 800cc 650cc
Power 95hp 68hp
Torque 75nm. 64nm.
Cylinders / valves 4 cylinders, 16 valves Twin cylinder, 8 valves
Weight 207kg 193kg
Front brake Disc ø320mm(double) 300 mm dual disc, dual-piston caliper
Rear brake Disc ø260mm 220 mm single disc, single-piston caliper
Seat height (cm) 81cm 79cm
Front tyre 120/70ZR17 120/70 ZR17
Rear tyre 180/55ZR17 160/60 ZR17
Cooling Liquid cooling Liquid cooling
Front suspension Telescopic Upside-Down 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear suspension Preloaded hydraulic knob adjustable rear shock absorbers Horizontal back-link with preload adjustment
Motorcycle type Supersport Supersport
Top speed 250km/h 220km/h
Fuel capacity / consumption 16 L – 7 L/100km 15 L – 4.5 L/100km
Service network
Service quality
Parts availability
Price Price not listed. $8299
Brand price lists View QJMOTOR price list View KAWASAKI price list
Extra features

-TFT display

-Assist & Slipper Clutch

-Economic Riding Indicator

Opinions

You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.

No published opinions yet — you can be the first.

After you vote, you can add a brief opinion here (the form opens without reloading the page).

2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR vs 2023 KAWASAKI Ninja 650: listed specifications

The 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR and 2023 KAWASAKI Ninja 650 differ on the listed specifications: the SRK 800 RR has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed, and the Ninja 650 has a lower listed weight.

Engine displacement

SRK 800 RR has a clearly larger listed engine displacement (800 cc vs 650 cc).

Peak power

SRK 800 RR has a clear listed power advantage (95 hp vs 68 hp).

Torque

SRK 800 RR has a clear listed torque advantage (75 Nm vs 64 Nm).

Listed top speed

SRK 800 RR has a clear listed top-speed advantage (250 km/h vs 220 km/h).

Cooling

Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.

Weight and seat height

Ninja 650 has a modest listed weight advantage (193 kg vs 207 kg). Ninja 650 has a lower listed seat height (79 cm vs 81 cm).

Conclusion

The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.

Build your comparison

Pick the first two bikes (required). Use Add 3rd bike for more models, then Add 4th bike if you need it. Choose from the list and press Compare.

Frequently asked questions

What is the top speed of QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR vs KAWASAKI Ninja 650?

QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR is listed at 250 km/h (155 mph) vs 220 km/h (137 mph) for KAWASAKI Ninja 650.

Which has more horsepower, QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR or KAWASAKI Ninja 650?

QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR has 95 hp compared with 68 hp on the KAWASAKI Ninja 650.

Which is lighter, QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR or KAWASAKI Ninja 650?

KAWASAKI Ninja 650 is lighter at 193 kg vs 207 kg for QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR.

Which is better, QJ MOTOR SRK 800 RR or KAWASAKI Ninja 650?

It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.