2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 vs TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 79.5 cm Lowest seat here
- TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 83.5 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 4 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 75 hp (2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650) up to 81 hp (TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660).
- Torque spans 64 Nm (TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660) up to 65 Nm (2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650).
- Weight spans 206 kg (TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660) to 236 kg (2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650).
- Engine sizes are very close.
Reader votes so far — total 2: 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 (1); TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 (1).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | QJ MOTOR SVT 650 | TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | QJMOTOR | TRIUMPH |
| Model | QJ MOTOR SVT 650 | TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 |
| Engine size | 650cc | 650cc |
| Power | 75hp | 81hp |
| Torque | 65nm. | 64nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | 3 cylinders, 12 valves |
| Weight | 236kg | 206kg |
| Front brake | Hydr.Disc ø320mm(double)(ABS) | Nissin two-piston sliding calipers, twin 310mm discs, ABS |
| Rear brake | Hydr.Disc ø260mm(ABS) | Nissin single-piston sliding caliper, single 255mm disc, ABS |
| Seat height (cm) | 79.5cm | 83.5cm |
| Front tyre | 110/80R19 | 120/70 ZR 17 (58W) (Michelin Road 5 tyres) |
| Rear tyre | 150/70R17 | 180/55 ZR 17 (73W) (Michelin Road 5 tyres) |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Telescopic Upside-Down | Showa 41mm upside down separate function cartridge forks, 150mm wheel travel |
| Rear suspension | Telescopic coil spring oil damped | Showa monoshock RSU, with remote hydraulic preload adjustment, 150mm wheel travel |
| Motorcycle type | Adventure | Adventure |
| Top speed | 210km/h | 200km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 20 L – 5 L/100km | 17.2 L – 4.7 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | Price not listed. | $9695 |
| Brand price lists | View QJMOTOR price list | View TRIUMPH price list |
| Extra features | -TFT Display |
-Slip & assist clutch, Traction Control, 2 riding modes (Road and Rain), Shift Assist, TFT display, My Triumph Connectivity System. |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 vs 2023 TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660: listed specifications
The 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 and 2023 TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 are closely matched in torque and displacement, while the SVT 650 has the higher listed top speed, and the Tiger Sport 660 has more peak power, and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
SVT 650 and Tiger Sport 660 have very similar engine displacement (650 cc vs 650 cc).
Peak power
Tiger Sport 660 has a modest listed power advantage (81 hp vs 75 hp).
Torque
SVT 650 and Tiger Sport 660 have very similar listed torque (65 Nm vs 64 Nm).
Listed top speed
SVT 650 has a modest listed top-speed advantage (210 km/h vs 200 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
Tiger Sport 660 is notably lighter on the listed weight (206 kg vs 236 kg). There is a noticeable listed seat-height difference: Tiger Sport 660 is listed higher (83.5 cm) than SVT 650 (79.5 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in peak power, listed top speed, weight and seat height, while displacement and torque remain relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of QJ MOTOR SVT 650 vs TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660?
QJ MOTOR SVT 650 is listed at 210 km/h (130 mph) vs 200 km/h (124 mph) for TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660.
Which has more horsepower, QJ MOTOR SVT 650 or TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660?
TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 has 81 hp compared with 75 hp on the QJ MOTOR SVT 650.
Which is lighter, QJ MOTOR SVT 650 or TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660?
TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660 is lighter at 206 kg vs 236 kg for QJ MOTOR SVT 650.
Which is better, QJ MOTOR SVT 650 or TRIUMPH Tiger Sport 660?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
