2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 80.4 cm Tallest seat here
- 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 79.5 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 0.9 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 47 hp (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650) up to 75 hp (2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650).
- Torque spans 52 Nm (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650) up to 65 Nm (2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650).
- Weight spans 202 kg (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650) to 236 kg (2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650).
- Engine sizes are very close.
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 | QJ MOTOR SVT 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Royal Enfield | QJMOTOR |
| Model | Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 | QJ MOTOR SVT 650 |
| Engine size | 650cc | 650cc |
| Power | 47hp | 75hp |
| Torque | 52nm. | 65nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves |
| Weight | 202kg | 236kg |
| Front brake | 320 mm disc, ABS | Hydr.Disc ø320mm(double)(ABS) |
| Rear brake | 240 mm disc, ABS | Hydr.Disc ø260mm(ABS) |
| Seat height (cm) | 80.4cm | 79.5cm |
| Front tyre | 100/90-18 M/C 56H | 110/80R19 |
| Rear tyre | 130/70-R18 M/C 63V/130/70-18 M/C 63H | 150/70R17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Telescopic forks | Telescopic Upside-Down |
| Rear suspension | Twin gas charged shock-absorbers with adjustable preload | Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
| Motorcycle type | Commuter | Adventure |
| Top speed | 202km/h | 210km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 13.7 L – 5.2 L/100km | 20 L – 5 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $6799 | Price not listed. |
| Brand price lists | View Royal Enfield price list | View QJMOTOR price list |
| Extra features | -TFT Display |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650: listed specifications
The 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and 2024 QJ MOTOR SVT 650 are closely matched in displacement, while the Continental GT 650 has a lower listed weight, and the SVT 650 has more peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed.
Engine displacement
Continental GT 650 and SVT 650 have very similar engine displacement (650 cc vs 650 cc).
Peak power
SVT 650 has a clear listed power advantage (75 hp vs 47 hp).
Torque
SVT 650 has a clear listed torque advantage (65 Nm vs 52 Nm).
Listed top speed
SVT 650 has a modest listed top-speed advantage (210 km/h vs 202 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
Continental GT 650 is notably lighter on the listed weight (202 kg vs 236 kg). Continental GT 650 and SVT 650 have very similar seat heights (80.4 cm vs 79.5 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in peak power, torque, listed top speed and weight, while displacement and seat height remain relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs QJ MOTOR SVT 650?
QJ MOTOR SVT 650 is listed at 210 km/h (130 mph) vs 202 km/h (126 mph) for Royal Enfield Continental GT 650.
Which has more horsepower, Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 or QJ MOTOR SVT 650?
QJ MOTOR SVT 650 has 75 hp compared with 47 hp on the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650.
Which is lighter, Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 or QJ MOTOR SVT 650?
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is lighter at 202 kg vs 236 kg for QJ MOTOR SVT 650.
Which is better, Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 or QJ MOTOR SVT 650?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
