2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400 vs 2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400 78.5 cm Lowest seat here
- 2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 80 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 1.5 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 24.3 hp (2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410) up to 41 hp (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400).
- Torque spans 32 Nm (2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410) up to 37 Nm (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400).
- Weight spans 186 kg (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400) to 199 kg (2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410).
- Engine sizes are very close.
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | QJ MOTOR SRK 400 | Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | QJMOTOR | Royal Enfield |
| Model | QJ MOTOR SRK 400 | Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 |
| Engine size | 400cc | 400cc |
| Power | 41hp | 24.3hp |
| Torque | 37nm. | 32nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves |
| Weight | 186kg | 199kg |
| Front brake | Hydr.Disc ø260mm(double)(ABS) | Disc (300mm), 2-piston floating caliper |
| Rear brake | Hydr.Disc ø240mm(ABS) | Disc (240MM), 1-piston floating caliper |
| Seat height (cm) | 78.5cm | 80cm |
| Front tyre | 110/70 R17 M/C | 90/90-21 M/C 54H |
| Rear tyre | 150/60 R17 M/C | 120/90-17 64S |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Telescopic Upside-Down | hydraulic telescopic fork 41 mm Ø.200 mm travel |
| Rear suspension | Telescopic coil spring oil damped | progressive central spring strut 5-way adjustable, 180mm travel |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Touring |
| Top speed | 195km/h | 150km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 13.5 L – 5.2 L/100km | 14 L – 3 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | Price not listed. | $5049 |
| Brand price lists | View QJMOTOR price list | View Royal Enfield price list |
| Extra features | -TFT display |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400 vs 2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410: listed specifications
The 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 400 and 2024 Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 are closely matched in displacement, while the SRK 400 has more peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
SRK 400 and Himalayan 410 have very similar engine displacement (400 cc vs 400 cc).
Peak power
SRK 400 has a clear listed power advantage (41 hp vs 24.3 hp).
Torque
SRK 400 has a clear listed torque advantage (37 Nm vs 32 Nm).
Listed top speed
SRK 400 has a clear listed top-speed advantage (195 km/h vs 150 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
SRK 400 has a modest listed weight advantage (186 kg vs 199 kg). SRK 400 has a lower listed seat height (78.5 cm vs 80 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height, while displacement remains relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of QJ MOTOR SRK 400 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 410?
QJ MOTOR SRK 400 is listed at 195 km/h (121 mph) vs 150 km/h (93 mph) for Royal Enfield Himalayan 410.
Which has more horsepower, QJ MOTOR SRK 400 or Royal Enfield Himalayan 410?
QJ MOTOR SRK 400 has 41 hp compared with 24 hp on the Royal Enfield Himalayan 410.
Which is lighter, QJ MOTOR SRK 400 or Royal Enfield Himalayan 410?
QJ MOTOR SRK 400 is lighter at 186 kg vs 199 kg for Royal Enfield Himalayan 410.
Which is better, QJ MOTOR SRK 400 or Royal Enfield Himalayan 410?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
