2024 SYM MMBCU 160 vs 2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 SYM MMBCU 160 80.3 cm Tallest seat here
- 2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200 78 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 2.3 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 12 hp (2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200) up to 16 hp (2024 SYM MMBCU 160).
- Torque spans 12.5 Nm (2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200) up to 15 Nm (2024 SYM MMBCU 160).
- Weight spans 134 kg (2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200) to 136 kg (2024 SYM MMBCU 160).
- Displacement spans 150 cc (2024 SYM MMBCU 160) to 200 cc (2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200).
Reader votes so far — total 1: 2024 SYM MMBCU 160 (0); 2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200 (1).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | SYM MMBCU 160 | SYM JET14 Evo 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | SYM | SYM |
| Model | SYM MMBCU 160 | SYM JET14 Evo 200 |
| Engine size | 150cc | 200cc |
| Power | 16hp | 12hp |
| Torque | 15nm. | 12.5nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves |
| Weight | 136kg | 134kg |
| Front brake | Disk Ø 260mm + ABS | Dual braking aids: 2-channel ABS or CBS are also standard equipped |
| Rear brake | Disc Ø 230 mm + ABS | Dual braking aids: 2-channel ABS or CBS are also standard equipped |
| Seat height (cm) | 80.3cm | 78cm |
| Front tyre | 120 / 70 - 13 | 100/90-14 |
| Rear tyre | 130 / 70 - 13 | 120 / 80-14 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Telescopic Fork | Telescope fork |
| Rear suspension | Mono Shock | Dual Shock |
| Motorcycle type | Scooter | Scooter |
| Top speed | 130km/h | 120km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 7.4 L – 3.2 L/100km | 7.2 L – 3 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | Price not listed. | Price not listed. |
| Brand price lists | View SYM price list | View SYM price list |
| Extra features |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 SYM MMBCU 160 vs 2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200: listed specifications
The 2024 SYM MMBCU 160 and 2024 SYM JET14 Evo 200 are closely matched in weight, while the MMBCU 160 has more peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed, and the JET14 Evo 200 has more displacement.
Engine displacement
JET14 Evo 200 has a clearly larger listed engine displacement (200 cc vs 150 cc).
Peak power
MMBCU 160 has a clear listed power advantage (16 hp vs 12 hp).
Torque
MMBCU 160 has a clear listed torque advantage (15 Nm vs 12.5 Nm).
Listed top speed
MMBCU 160 has a modest listed top-speed advantage (130 km/h vs 120 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
MMBCU 160 and JET14 Evo 200 have very similar listed weights (136 kg vs 134 kg). JET14 Evo 200 has a lower listed seat height (78 cm vs 80.3 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed and seat height, while weight remains relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of SYM MMBCU 160 vs SYM JET14 Evo 200?
SYM MMBCU 160 is listed at 130 km/h (81 mph) vs 120 km/h (75 mph) for SYM JET14 Evo 200.
Which has more horsepower, SYM MMBCU 160 or SYM JET14 Evo 200?
SYM MMBCU 160 has 16 hp compared with 12 hp on the SYM JET14 Evo 200.
Which is lighter, SYM MMBCU 160 or SYM JET14 Evo 200?
SYM JET14 Evo 200 is lighter at 134 kg vs 136 kg for SYM MMBCU 160.
Which is better, SYM MMBCU 160 or SYM JET14 Evo 200?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
