2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9 vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9 81 cm Lowest seat here
- 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X 83.5 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 2.5 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 76 hp (2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X) up to 119 hp (2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9).
- Torque spans 67 Nm (2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X) up to 93 Nm (2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9).
- Weight spans 213 kg (2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9) to 260 kg (2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X).
- Displacement spans 800 cc (2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X) to 900 cc (2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | YAMAHA Tracer 9 | QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | YAMAHA | QJMOTOR |
| Model | YAMAHA Tracer 9 | QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X |
| Engine size | 900cc | 800cc |
| Power | 119hp | 76hp |
| Torque | 93nm. | 67nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | 3 cylinders, 12 valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves |
| Weight | 213kg | 260kg |
| Front brake | Hydraulic dual disc, Ø 298 mm | Hydr.Disc ø320mm (double)(ABS) |
| Rear brake | Hydraulic single disc, Ø 245 mm Nissen Calipers | Hydr.Disc ø260mm (ABS) |
| Seat height (cm) | 81cm | 83.5cm |
| Front tyre | 120/70 ZR17M/C (58W) (Tubeless) Michelin | 110/80R19 (Spoke) |
| Rear tyre | 180/55 ZR17M/C (73W) (Tubeless) Michelin | 150/70R17 (Spoke) |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Adjustable Telescopic fork | Telescopic Upside-Down |
| Rear suspension | Swingarm | Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
| Motorcycle type | Adventure | Adventure |
| Top speed | 230km/h | 218km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 18.7 L – 5.5 L/100km | 18.5 L – 5.8 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $16000 | Price not listed. |
| Brand price lists | View YAMAHA price list | View QJMOTOR price list |
| Extra features | -6-axis IMU governs a lean-sensitive 3-mode Traction Control System (TCS), as well as a Slide Control System (SCS), front wheel LIFt Control System (LIF) and Brake Control system (BC) -Twin 3.5-inch TFT meters |
-TFT Display |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9 vs 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X: listed specifications
The 2024 YAMAHA Tracer 9 and 2024 QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X differ on the listed specifications: the Tracer 9 has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
Tracer 9 has a larger listed engine displacement (900 cc vs 800 cc).
Peak power
Tracer 9 has a clear listed power advantage (119 hp vs 76 hp).
Torque
Tracer 9 has a clear listed torque advantage (93 Nm vs 67 Nm).
Listed top speed
Tracer 9 has a modest listed top-speed advantage (230 km/h vs 218 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
Tracer 9 is notably lighter on the listed weight (213 kg vs 260 kg). Tracer 9 has a lower listed seat height (81 cm vs 83.5 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of YAMAHA Tracer 9 vs QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X?
YAMAHA Tracer 9 is listed at 230 km/h (143 mph) vs 218 km/h (135 mph) for QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X.
Which has more horsepower, YAMAHA Tracer 9 or QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X?
YAMAHA Tracer 9 has 119 hp compared with 76 hp on the QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X.
Which is lighter, YAMAHA Tracer 9 or QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X?
YAMAHA Tracer 9 is lighter at 213 kg vs 260 kg for QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X.
Which is better, YAMAHA Tracer 9 or QJ MOTOR SRT 800 X?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
