BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 vs BAJAJ Pulsar F 250
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 79 cm Lowest seat here
- BAJAJ Pulsar F 250 79 cm Lowest seat here
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Claimed power figures are very close across these bikes.
- Torque figures are very close.
- Weights are very close.
- Engine sizes are very close.
Reader votes so far — total 1: BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 (1); BAJAJ Pulsar F 250 (0).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 | BAJAJ Pulsar F 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | BAJAJ | BAJAJ |
| Model | BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 | BAJAJ Pulsar F 250 |
| Engine size | 250cc | 250cc |
| Power | 22.5hp | 22.5hp |
| Torque | 21.5nm. | 21.5nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 2 valves | Single cylinder, 2 valves |
| Weight | 164kg | 164kg |
| Front brake | ABS (Grimeca Calipers) | ABS (Grimeca Calipers) |
| Rear brake | ABS (Grimeca Calipers) | ABS (Grimeca Calipers) |
| Seat height (cm) | 79cm | 79cm |
| Front tyre | 100/80-17 52P | 100/80-17 52P |
| Rear tyre | 130/70-17 62P | 130/70-17 62P |
| Cooling | Oil cooled | Oil cooled |
| Front suspension | Telescopic | Telescopic |
| Rear suspension | Coil-spring, single shock absorber | Coil-spring, single shock absorber |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Naked |
| Top speed | 145km/h | 145km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 14 L – 3 L/100km | 14 L – 3 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $2480 | $2580 |
| Brand price lists | View BAJAJ price list | View BAJAJ price list |
| Extra features |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 vs 2023 BAJAJ Pulsar F 250: listed specifications
The 2023 BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 and 2023 BAJAJ Pulsar F 250 are closely matched on the listed specifications that can be compared.
Engine displacement
Pulsar N 250 and Pulsar F 250 have very similar engine displacement (250 cc vs 250 cc).
Peak power
Pulsar N 250 and Pulsar F 250 have very similar peak power (22.5 hp vs 22.5 hp).
Torque
Pulsar N 250 and Pulsar F 250 have very similar listed torque (21.5 Nm vs 21.5 Nm).
Listed top speed
Pulsar N 250 and Pulsar F 250 have very similar listed top speeds (145 km/h vs 145 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as oil-cooled.
Weight and seat height
Pulsar N 250 and Pulsar F 250 have very similar listed weights (164 kg vs 164 kg). Pulsar N 250 and Pulsar F 250 have very similar seat heights (79 cm vs 79 cm).
Conclusion
The listed specifications that can be compared remain relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 vs BAJAJ Pulsar F 250?
Both are listed at 145 km/h (90 mph) top speed in our specification data.
Which has more horsepower, BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 or BAJAJ Pulsar F 250?
Both are rated at 23 hp in our database.
Which is lighter, BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 or BAJAJ Pulsar F 250?
Both weigh 164 kg in our database.
Which is better, BAJAJ Pulsar N 250 or BAJAJ Pulsar F 250?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
