2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S vs BMW M 1000 RR
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S 78 cm Lowest seat here
- BMW M 1000 RR 83 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 5 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 27.5 hp (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S) up to 212 hp (BMW M 1000 RR).
- Torque spans 22.5 Nm (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S) up to 113 Nm (BMW M 1000 RR).
- Weight spans 151 kg (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S) to 214 kg (BMW M 1000 RR).
- Displacement spans 250 cc (2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S) to 1000 cc (BMW M 1000 RR).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S | BMW M 1000 RR |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | QJMOTOR | BMW |
| Model | QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S | BMW M 1000 RR |
| Engine size | 250cc | 1000cc |
| Power | 27.5hp | 212hp |
| Torque | 22.5nm. | 113nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves | 4 cylinders, 16 valves |
| Weight | 151kg | 214kg |
| Front brake | Disc ø300mm | M Twin disc brake, diameter 320 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper |
| Rear brake | Disc ø240mm | M Single disc brake, diameter 220 mm, 2-piston fixed caliper |
| Seat height (cm) | 78cm | 83cm |
| Front tyre | 110-70-R17 | 120/70 ZR17 |
| Rear tyre | 140/60-R17 | 200/55 ZR17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Telescopic Upside-Down | Upside-down telescopic fork, diameter 45 mm, spring preload, rebound and compression stages adjustable |
| Rear suspension | Telescopic coil spring oil damped | Aluminium swing arm, full floater pro, compression and rebound damping adjustable, adjustable spring preload |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Supersport |
| Top speed | 158km/h | 324km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 12.5 L – 3.7 L/100km | 16.5 L – 7.5 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | Price not listed. | $32995 |
| Brand price lists | View QJMOTOR price list | View BMW price list |
| Extra features | -TFT display |
-M Chassis Kit; Rear height adjustment & Swingarm pivot, Windshield high, BMW Motorrad ABS and ABS Pro -7 riding modes (Rain, Road, Dynamic, Race, Race Pro 1-3), Pit-Lane-Limiter -Dynamic Traction Control (DTC) +/- Shift, Hill Start Control (HSC) Pro, Dynamic Brake Control -Gearshift Assist Pro, Ready for reverse gear shift pattern, 6.5" TFT-Display with Connectivity -LED Headlight, Rear light and Indicators, Heated Grips, Cruise Control, M Lightweight Battery -M GPS Laptrigger software, M Carbon Wheels |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S vs 2023 BMW M 1000 RR: listed specifications
The 2024 QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S and 2023 BMW M 1000 RR differ on the listed specifications: the SRK 250 S has a lower listed weight, and the M 1000 RR has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed.
Engine displacement
M 1000 RR has a clearly larger listed engine displacement (1000 cc vs 250 cc).
Peak power
M 1000 RR has a clear listed power advantage (212 hp vs 27.5 hp).
Torque
M 1000 RR has a clear listed torque advantage (113 Nm vs 22.5 Nm).
Listed top speed
M 1000 RR has a clear listed top-speed advantage (324 km/h vs 158 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
SRK 250 S is notably lighter on the listed weight (151 kg vs 214 kg). There is a noticeable listed seat-height difference: M 1000 RR is listed higher (83 cm) than SRK 250 S (78 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S vs BMW M 1000 RR?
BMW M 1000 RR is listed at 324 km/h (201 mph) vs 158 km/h (98 mph) for QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S.
Which has more horsepower, QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S or BMW M 1000 RR?
BMW M 1000 RR has 212 hp compared with 28 hp on the QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S.
Which is lighter, QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S or BMW M 1000 RR?
QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S is lighter at 151 kg vs 214 kg for BMW M 1000 RR.
Which is better, QJ MOTOR SRK 250 S or BMW M 1000 RR?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
