CF MOTO 300NK vs KTM RC 200
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- CF MOTO 300NK 79.5 cm Lowest seat here
- KTM RC 200 82.4 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 2.9 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 25 hp (KTM RC 200) up to 29 hp (CF MOTO 300NK).
- Torque spans 19.5 Nm (KTM RC 200) up to 25.3 Nm (CF MOTO 300NK).
- Weight spans 140 kg (KTM RC 200) to 151 kg (CF MOTO 300NK).
- Displacement spans 200 cc (KTM RC 200) to 300 cc (CF MOTO 300NK).
Reader votes so far — total 4: CF MOTO 300NK (4); KTM RC 200 (0).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | CF MOTO 300NK | KTM RC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CF MOTO | KTM |
| Model | CF MOTO 300NK | KTM RC 200 |
| Engine size | 300cc | 200cc |
| Power | 29hp | 25hp |
| Torque | 25.3nm. | 19.5nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves |
| Weight | 151kg | 140kg |
| Front brake | Φ292mm Single-disc, 4-piston caliper | Four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc (Bybre) |
| Rear brake | Φ220mm Single-disc,single piston caliper | Single-piston floating calliper, brake disc (Bybre) |
| Seat height (cm) | 79.5cm | 82.4cm |
| Front tyre | 110/70 R17 M/C | 110/70 R17 |
| Rear tyre | 140/60 R17 M/C | 150/60 R17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | 37mm inverted fork telescopic | WP APEX 43 |
| Rear suspension | Single central shock absorber | WP APEX - Monoshock |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Supersport |
| Top speed | 167km/h | 145km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 13 L – 3.6 L/100km | 13.7 L – 3 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $4199 | $2595 |
| Brand price lists | View CF MOTO price list | View KTM price list |
| Extra features | -Euro5, Slipper Clutch -Ghost display, Navigation, Bluetooth Connectivity -Power modes: Sport and Economic -Bosch EFI, Continental ABS |
-LCD Display |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 CF MOTO 300NK vs 2023 KTM RC 200: listed specifications
The 2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 differ on the listed specifications: the 300NK has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed, and the RC 200 has a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
300NK has a clearly larger listed engine displacement (300 cc vs 200 cc).
Peak power
300NK has a clear listed power advantage (29 hp vs 25 hp).
Torque
300NK has a clear listed torque advantage (25.3 Nm vs 19.5 Nm).
Listed top speed
300NK has a clear listed top-speed advantage (167 km/h vs 145 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
RC 200 has a modest listed weight advantage (140 kg vs 151 kg). 300NK has a lower listed seat height (79.5 cm vs 82.4 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of CF MOTO 300NK vs KTM RC 200?
CF MOTO 300NK is listed at 167 km/h (104 mph) vs 145 km/h (90 mph) for KTM RC 200.
Which has more horsepower, CF MOTO 300NK or KTM RC 200?
CF MOTO 300NK has 29 hp compared with 25 hp on the KTM RC 200.
Which is lighter, CF MOTO 300NK or KTM RC 200?
KTM RC 200 is lighter at 140 kg vs 151 kg for CF MOTO 300NK.
Which is better, CF MOTO 300NK or KTM RC 200?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
