CF MOTO 300NK vs KTM RC 200
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- CF MOTO 300NK 79.5 cm Lowest seat here
- KTM RC 200 82.4 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 2.9 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 25 hp (KTM RC 200) up to 29 hp (CF MOTO 300NK).
- Torque spans 19.5 Nm (KTM RC 200) up to 25.3 Nm (CF MOTO 300NK).
- Weight spans 140 kg (KTM RC 200) to 151 kg (CF MOTO 300NK).
- Displacement spans 200 cc (KTM RC 200) to 300 cc (CF MOTO 300NK).
Reader votes so far — total 4: CF MOTO 300NK (4); KTM RC 200 (0).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | CF MOTO 300NK | KTM RC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CF MOTO | KTM |
| Model | CF MOTO 300NK | KTM RC 200 |
| Engine size | 300cc | 200cc |
| Power | 29hp | 25hp |
| Torque | 25.3nm. | 19.5nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves |
| Weight | 151kg | 140kg |
| Front brake | Φ292mm Single-disc, 4-piston caliper | Four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc (Bybre) |
| Rear brake | Φ220mm Single-disc,single piston caliper | Single-piston floating calliper, brake disc (Bybre) |
| Seat height (cm) | 79.5cm | 82.4cm |
| Front tyre | 110/70 R17 M/C | 110/70 R17 |
| Rear tyre | 140/60 R17 M/C | 150/60 R17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | 37mm inverted fork telescopic | WP APEX 43 |
| Rear suspension | Single central shock absorber | WP APEX - Monoshock |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Supersport |
| Top speed | 167km/h | 145km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 13 L – 3.6 L/100km | 13.7 L – 3 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $4199 | $2595 |
| Brand price lists | View CF MOTO price list | View KTM price list |
| Extra features | -Euro5, Slipper Clutch -Ghost display, Navigation, Bluetooth Connectivity -Power modes: Sport and Economic -Bosch EFI, Continental ABS |
-LCD Display |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 CF MOTO 300NK vs 2023 KTM RC 200: Which One is Better for You?
2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 are very similar in terms of engine capacity and power. In this case, design, driving comfort, and personal preferences may take precedence. Additionally, 2023 CF MOTO 300NK, with its 29hp, stands out for users seeking speed and performance.
1. Cylinder Capacity and Performance
2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 have almost identical engine capacities, offering similar performance. In this case, design, driving comfort, and other features will play a more significant role in your choice.2023 CF MOTO 300NK, with its 300cc engine capacity, is ideal for users seeking high performance and acceleration. It is ideal for intermediate users in urban areas and short distances.
2. Torque Power
2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 offer similar performance in terms of torque values. 2023 CF MOTO 300NK, with its 25.3Nm, provides slightly better traction power, which can be advantageous in situations requiring rapid acceleration. 2023 CF MOTO 300NK is ideal for users requiring rapid acceleration. This torque value provides economical and sufficient power for city use.
3. Top Speed
2023 CF MOTO 300NK, as a Naked, can reach a maximum speed of 167 km/h. This speed feature can be considered an extra advantage for a motorcycle of this type. 2023 KTM RC 200, as a Süpersport, offers a lower maximum speed of 145 km/h, but this does not overshadow its other features.
4. Cooling System
2023 CF MOTO 300NK features a Liquid-Cooled system, while 2023 KTM RC 200 offers a Liquid-Cooled system. Both models deliver equal performance in their cooling systems.
5. Design and Comfort
2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 are close in weight, offering similar experiences for different usage scenarios. Additionally, 2023 KTM RC 200, with a seat height of 82.4cm, is more suitable for taller riders, offering greater comfort.2023 CF MOTO 300NK, with a seat height of 79.5cm, provides a more ergonomic ride for average-height riders.
Conclusion
2023 KTM RC 200 emerges as the winner of this comparison based on total points. 2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 have nearly identical engine capacities. 2023 CF MOTO 300NK and 2023 KTM RC 200 offer very similar performance in terms of torque. 2023 CF MOTO 300NK, with a top speed of 167 km/h, stands out for speed enthusiasts. Both models have similar cooling systems, offering comparable performance for long journeys. In conclusion, 2023 KTM RC 200 stands out in terms of technical specifications and overall performance. However, depending on your riding preferences and usage needs, both models offer unique advantages.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of CF MOTO 300NK vs KTM RC 200?
CF MOTO 300NK is listed at 167 km/h vs 145 km/h for KTM RC 200.
Which has more horsepower, CF MOTO 300NK or KTM RC 200?
CF MOTO 300NK has 29 hp compared with 25 hp on the KTM RC 200.
Which is better, CF MOTO 300NK or KTM RC 200?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
