LS2 FF366 Cyber vs HJC C-90

Mark your favourite helmet and vote — results update instantly, no account needed. Sharing your pick helps others deciding between these models.

Impact resistance map (legacy four zones)

No verified 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s point data for these records. Legacy four zones are not placed into the three-speed map without a verified speed.

Front
LS2  FF366 Cyber Front
FF366 Cyber
HJC C-90 Front
C-90
Right side
LS2  FF366 Cyber Right side
FF366 Cyber
HJC C-90 Right side
C-90
Rear
LS2  FF366 Cyber Rear
FF366 Cyber
HJC C-90 Rear
C-90
Left side
LS2  FF366 Cyber Left side
FF366 Cyber
HJC C-90 Left side
C-90

Technical specifications

Feature FF366 Cyber C-90
Brand LS2 HJC
Model FF366 Cyber C-90
Product / model code — —
Safety summary SHARP: 4.0 stars SHARP: 4.0 stars
Helmet type Full face Modular
Durability
Weight 1.7 kg 1.8 kg
Size XS S M L XL XXL XS S M L XL XXL
Listed price (reference) $105 $120
Material Thermoplastic Polycarbonate
Retention system Micrometric Double D-Ring
Certification UN ECE REG 22.05 UN ECE REG 22.05
Shell sizes Single size Multi size
Pinlock ready No Yes
Scratch-resistant visor No Yes
Quick-release visor No Yes
Removable cheek pads No Yes
Intercom ready No Yes
Ventilation channels Yes Yes
Internal sun visor No Yes
Removable liner Yes Yes

Change helmets

Build your helmet comparison

Pick the first two helmets (required). Use Add 3rd helmet for more models, then Add 4th helmet if needed.

Helmet comparison FAQ

LS2 FF366 Cyber vs HJC C-90: what are the main differences?

Looking at the selected models side by side: All listed helmets share the same certification entry: UN ECE REG 22.05. Helmet types differ: FF366 Cyber (Full face), C-90 (Modular). FF366 Cyber is the lightest listed at 1.7 kg; the heaviest is C-90 at 1.8 kg (about 0.10 kg apart; weight can vary by size). These points summarise measurable catalogue fields; fit and real-world comfort still depend on trying the correct size.

Do these helmets have the same safety certification?

FF366 Cyber is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. C-90 is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. On paper they share the same certification entry. ECE 22.05, ECE 22.06 and DOT are legal approval standards; a SHARP star rating (when present) is a separate independent lab assessment and must not be read as the same kind of result. We do not infer SHARP stars from an ECE mark alone. Verified SHARP ratings on this page: FF366 Cyber: 4.0 stars; C-90: 4.0 stars.

What do the colours on the impact zone map mean?

Our map stores regional codes on a 1–6 scale (greener ≈ stronger on this page; brown ≈ weaker). When verified multi-speed SHARP point data is present, you can switch 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s and see front-top, front-lower, rear, left and right separately — missing speeds or points show “no data” and are never filled from another speed. Older records may only have the legacy four zones (front/rear/sides) without a verified speed label; those are not placed into the three-speed map. Zone colours are not the same thing as a SHARP star rating. For the models on this page where the safety source is marked SHARP, zone codes are treated as SHARP-linked map data.

How do these helmets compare in front, rear and side impact tests?

Front, rear, right-side and left-side codes are available for FF366 Cyber and C-90. Across those zones the stored codes look broadly similar. These comparisons use the legacy four-zone fields only; impact speed was not verified for the three-speed map.

Which helmet is lighter, and by how much?

Listed weights: FF366 Cyber: 1.7 kg; C-90: 1.8 kg. FF366 Cyber is the lightest in this set, about 0.10 kg below the heaviest. Treat this as catalogue data for a typical size — exact mass can change with size and lining.

Which helmets support Pinlock or have an internal sun visor?

Pinlock-ready anti-fog visor support is marked for C-90 (ready/compatible in our catalogue — not “insert included in the box” unless the retailer says so); not marked for FF366 Cyber; an internal sun visor is marked for C-90; no internal sun visor flag for FF366 Cyber.