HJC RPHA 11 vs AGV GP Tech

Mark your favourite helmet and vote — results update instantly, no account needed. Sharing your pick helps others deciding between these models.

RPHA 11
0

HJC

Full specs page
GP Tech
0

AGV

Full specs page

Impact resistance map (legacy four zones)

No verified 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s point data for these records. Legacy four zones are not placed into the three-speed map without a verified speed.

Front
HJC RPHA 11 Front
RPHA 11
AGV GP Tech Front
GP Tech
Right side
HJC RPHA 11 Right side
RPHA 11
AGV GP Tech Right side
GP Tech
Rear
HJC RPHA 11 Rear
RPHA 11
AGV GP Tech Rear
GP Tech
Left side
HJC RPHA 11 Left side
RPHA 11
AGV GP Tech Left side
GP Tech

Technical specifications

Feature RPHA 11 GP Tech
Brand HJC AGV
Model RPHA 11 GP Tech
Product / model code — —
Safety summary SHARP: 3.0 stars SHARP: 5.0 stars
Helmet type Full face Full face
Durability
Weight 1.3 kg 1.5 kg
Size XXS XS S M L XL XXL XXS XS S M L XL XXL XXXL
Listed price (reference) $270 $399
Material Composite fiber Carbon
Retention system Double D-Ring Double D-Ring
Certification UN ECE REG 22.05 UN ECE REG 22.05
Shell sizes Single size Single size
Pinlock ready
Scratch-resistant visor
Quick-release visor
Removable cheek pads
Intercom ready
Ventilation channels
Internal sun visor
Removable liner

Change helmets

Build your helmet comparison

Pick the first two helmets (required). Use Add 3rd helmet for more models, then Add 4th helmet if needed.

More comparisons with these helmets

Browse other rider comparisons, or start a new one with up to four helmets.

All comparisons

Helmet comparison FAQ

HJC RPHA 11 vs AGV GP Tech: what are the main differences?

Looking at the selected models side by side: All listed helmets share the same certification entry: UN ECE REG 22.05. RPHA 11 is the lightest listed at 1.3 kg; the heaviest is GP Tech at 1.5 kg (about 0.20 kg apart; weight can vary by size). Pinlock-ready anti-fog visor support is listed for GP Tech (not all models). These points summarise measurable catalogue fields; fit and real-world comfort still depend on trying the correct size.

Do these helmets have the same safety certification?

RPHA 11 is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. GP Tech is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. On paper they share the same certification entry. ECE 22.05, ECE 22.06 and DOT are legal approval standards; a SHARP star rating (when present) is a separate independent lab assessment and must not be read as the same kind of result. We do not infer SHARP stars from an ECE mark alone. Verified SHARP ratings on this page: RPHA 11: 3.0 stars; GP Tech: 5.0 stars.

What do the colours on the impact zone map mean?

Our map stores regional codes on a 1–6 scale (greener ≈ stronger on this page; brown ≈ weaker). When verified multi-speed SHARP point data is present, you can switch 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s and see front-top, front-lower, rear, left and right separately — missing speeds or points show “no data” and are never filled from another speed. Older records may only have the legacy four zones (front/rear/sides) without a verified speed label; those are not placed into the three-speed map. Zone colours are not the same thing as a SHARP star rating. For the models on this page where the safety source is marked SHARP, zone codes are treated as SHARP-linked map data.

How do these helmets compare in front, rear and side impact tests?

Comparing the stored legacy zone codes: at the right side, GP Tech maps stronger while RPHA 11 maps weaker; at the left side, GP Tech maps stronger while RPHA 11 maps weaker. These comparisons use the legacy four-zone fields only; impact speed was not verified for the three-speed map.

Which helmet is lighter, and by how much?

Listed weights: RPHA 11: 1.3 kg; GP Tech: 1.5 kg. RPHA 11 is the lightest in this set, about 0.20 kg below the heaviest. Treat this as catalogue data for a typical size — exact mass can change with size and lining.

Which helmets support Pinlock or have an internal sun visor?

Pinlock-ready anti-fog visor support is marked for GP Tech (ready/compatible in our catalogue — not “insert included in the box” unless the retailer says so); not marked for RPHA 11.