HJC RPHA 90S vs CABERG HORUS

Mark your favourite helmet and vote — results update instantly, no account needed. Sharing your pick helps others deciding between these models.

Impact resistance map (legacy four zones)

No verified 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s point data for these records. Legacy four zones are not placed into the three-speed map without a verified speed.

Front
HJC RPHA 90S Front
RPHA 90S
CABERG HORUS Front
HORUS
Right side
HJC RPHA 90S Right side
RPHA 90S
CABERG HORUS Right side
HORUS
Rear
HJC RPHA 90S Rear
RPHA 90S
CABERG HORUS Rear
HORUS
Left side
HJC RPHA 90S Left side
RPHA 90S
CABERG HORUS Left side
HORUS

Technical specifications

Feature RPHA 90S HORUS
Brand HJC CABERG
Model RPHA 90S HORUS
Product / model code — —
Safety summary SHARP: 4.0 stars SHARP: 3.0 stars
Helmet type Modular Modular
Durability
Weight 1.6 kg 1.6 kg
Size XS S M L XL XS S M L XL
Listed price (reference) $400 $172
Material Carbon Thermoplastic
Retention system Micrometric Micrometric
Certification UN ECE REG 22.05 UN ECE REG 22.05
Shell sizes Single size Single size
Pinlock ready Yes Yes
Scratch-resistant visor Yes Yes
Quick-release visor Yes Yes
Removable cheek pads Yes Yes
Intercom ready Yes Yes
Ventilation channels Yes Yes
Internal sun visor Yes Yes
Removable liner Yes Yes

Change helmets

Build your helmet comparison

Pick the first two helmets (required). Use Add 3rd helmet for more models, then Add 4th helmet if needed.

Helmet comparison FAQ

HJC RPHA 90S vs CABERG HORUS: what are the main differences?

Looking at the selected models side by side: All listed helmets share the same certification entry: UN ECE REG 22.05. Shell materials differ — RPHA 90S: Carbon; HORUS: Thermoplastic. Verified SHARP star ratings in our data: RPHA 90S: 4.0 SHARP stars; HORUS: 3.0 SHARP stars. SHARP is an independent assessment, not a legal certification. These points summarise measurable catalogue fields; fit and real-world comfort still depend on trying the correct size.

Do these helmets have the same safety certification?

RPHA 90S is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. HORUS is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. On paper they share the same certification entry. ECE 22.05, ECE 22.06 and DOT are legal approval standards; a SHARP star rating (when present) is a separate independent lab assessment and must not be read as the same kind of result. We do not infer SHARP stars from an ECE mark alone. Verified SHARP ratings on this page: RPHA 90S: 4.0 stars; HORUS: 3.0 stars.

What do the colours on the impact zone map mean?

Our map stores regional codes on a 1–6 scale (greener ≈ stronger on this page; brown ≈ weaker). When verified multi-speed SHARP point data is present, you can switch 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s and see front-top, front-lower, rear, left and right separately — missing speeds or points show “no data” and are never filled from another speed. Older records may only have the legacy four zones (front/rear/sides) without a verified speed label; those are not placed into the three-speed map. Zone colours are not the same thing as a SHARP star rating. For the models on this page where the safety source is marked SHARP, zone codes are treated as SHARP-linked map data.

How do these helmets compare in front, rear and side impact tests?

Comparing the stored legacy zone codes: at the left side, RPHA 90S maps mid while HORUS maps weaker. These comparisons use the legacy four-zone fields only; impact speed was not verified for the three-speed map.

Which helmet is lighter, and by how much?

Listed weights: RPHA 90S: 1.6 kg; HORUS: 1.6 kg. They are within about 50 g of each other in our data, so none is meaningfully lighter. Manufacturer weight often varies by shell size.

Which helmets support Pinlock or have an internal sun visor?

Pinlock-ready anti-fog visor support is marked for RPHA 90S and HORUS (ready/compatible in our catalogue — not “insert included in the box” unless the retailer says so); an internal sun visor is marked for RPHA 90S and HORUS.