2024 BMW M 1000 XR vs KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- 2024 BMW M 1000 XR 85 cm Tallest seat here
- KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT 83 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 2 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 173 hp (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT) up to 201 hp (2024 BMW M 1000 XR).
- Torque spans 113 Nm (2024 BMW M 1000 XR) up to 141 Nm (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT).
- Weight spans 209 kg (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT) to 223 kg (2024 BMW M 1000 XR).
- Displacement spans 1000 cc (2024 BMW M 1000 XR) to 1100 cc (KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | BMW M 1000 XR | KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | BMW | KTM |
| Model | BMW M 1000 XR | KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT |
| Engine size | 1000cc | Above 1000cc |
| Power | 201hp | 173hp |
| Torque | 113nm. | 141nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | 4 cylinders, 16 valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves |
| Weight | 223kg | 209kg |
| Front brake | Twin disc brake, diameter 320 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper | 320mm Brembo four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc |
| Rear brake | Single disc brake, diameter 220 mm, 1-piston floating caliper | 240mm Brembo twin-piston fixed calliper, brake disc |
| Seat height (cm) | 85cm | 83cm |
| Front tyre | 120/70 ZR17 | 120/70 17 |
| Rear tyre | 200/55 ZR17 | 200/55 17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Upside-down telescopic fork, diameter 45 mm, electronic self-adjusting rebound/compression damping (Dynamic ESA) | WP Semi-active suspension USD Ø 48 mm |
| Rear suspension | Aluminum twin-sided swingarm, DDC Dynamic Damping Control (central shock absorber), adjustable spring preload, rebound and compression stages electronically adjustable | WP SAT (semi-active technology) shock absorber |
| Motorcycle type | Touring | Touring |
| Top speed | 290km/h | 260km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 20 L – 7.2 L/100km | 23 L – 6 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $24295 | $19799 |
| Brand price lists | View BMW price list | View KTM price list |
| Extra features | -Riding modes Pro (Rain, Road, Dynamic, Race, Race Pro 1–3, Pit Lane Limiter, Launch Control, Dynamic Traction Control (DTC) +/- Shift, -Wheelie Control, Slide Control, Dynamic Brake Control (DBC), shift assistant Pro, Automatic Hill Start Control (HSC) Pro) -TFT display with M start-up animation, Headlight Pro with adaptive headlight, Dynamic Damping Control (DDC) -M battery, M Forged wheels, M titanium rear silencer, M brake, BMW Motorrad ABS Pro, Sport windscreen -Adjustable steering damper, M seat, M brake and clutch lever, Keyless Ride, Tyre pressure control (TPC) -Heated grips, Cruise control, USB charging interface |
-Euro5, Heated Grips, -Riding Modes 4 Different riding modes: Rain, Street, Sport, and Track -7 inch TFT Dashboard, Twin Ignition Technology, Slipper Clutch, Wind Shield |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2024 BMW M 1000 XR vs 2023 KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT: listed specifications
The 2024 BMW M 1000 XR and 2023 KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT differ on the listed specifications: the M 1000 XR has more peak power, and the higher listed top speed, and the 1290 SUPER DUKE GT has more displacement and torque, and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a larger listed engine displacement (1100 cc vs 1000 cc).
Peak power
M 1000 XR has a clear listed power advantage (201 hp vs 173 hp).
Torque
1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a clear listed torque advantage (141 Nm vs 113 Nm).
Listed top speed
M 1000 XR has a clear listed top-speed advantage (290 km/h vs 260 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a modest listed weight advantage (209 kg vs 223 kg). 1290 SUPER DUKE GT has a lower listed seat height (83 cm vs 85 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of BMW M 1000 XR vs KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
BMW M 1000 XR is listed at 290 km/h (180 mph) vs 260 km/h (162 mph) for KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT.
Which has more horsepower, BMW M 1000 XR or KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
BMW M 1000 XR has 201 hp compared with 173 hp on the KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT.
Which is lighter, BMW M 1000 XR or KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT is lighter at 209 kg vs 223 kg for BMW M 1000 XR.
Which is better, BMW M 1000 XR or KTM 1290 SUPER DUKE GT?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
