BMW F 900 R vs KAWASAKI Z900
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- BMW F 900 R 81.5 cm Lowest seat here
- KAWASAKI Z900 82 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 0.5 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 105 hp (BMW F 900 R) up to 125 hp (KAWASAKI Z900).
- Torque spans 92 Nm (BMW F 900 R) up to 98.6 Nm (KAWASAKI Z900).
- Weight spans 212 kg (KAWASAKI Z900) to 219 kg (BMW F 900 R).
- Engine sizes are very close.
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | BMW F 900 R | KAWASAKI Z900 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | BMW | KAWASAKI |
| Model | BMW F 900 R | KAWASAKI Z900 |
| Engine size | 900cc | 900cc |
| Power | 105hp | 125hp |
| Torque | 92nm. | 98.6nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | 4 cylinders, 16 valves |
| Weight | 219kg | 212kg |
| Front brake | Dual disc brake, floating brake discs, Ø 320 mm, 4-piston radial brake calipers | 300 mm dual disc, 4-piston caliper |
| Rear brake | Single disc brake, Ø 265 mm, single-piston floating caliper | 250 mm single disc, single-piston caliper |
| Seat height (cm) | 81.5cm | 82cm |
| Front tyre | 120/70 ZR 17 | 120/70ZR17 |
| Rear tyre | 180/55 ZR 17 | 180/55ZR17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø 43 mm | 41 mm inverted fork, continuously adjustable compression and rebound damping, and spring preload adjustable |
| Rear suspension | Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load hydraulically adjustable, rebound damping adjustable | Horizontal back-link, continuously adjustable rebound damping, spring preload, and preload adjustability |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Adventure |
| Top speed | 230km/h | 240km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 13 L – 4.7 L/100km | 17 L – 6 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $10495 | $9899 |
| Brand price lists | View BMW price list | View KAWASAKI price list |
| Extra features | -coloured TFT display with BMW Motorrad Connectivity, LED headlight (low / high beam) -LED indicators, ASC, riding modes Rain/Road, adjustable hand brake and clutch levers, 12V socket |
-Assist Slipper Clutch -Economical Riding Indicator |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 BMW F 900 R vs 2023 KAWASAKI Z900: listed specifications
The 2023 BMW F 900 R and 2023 KAWASAKI Z900 are closely matched in displacement, while the Z900 has more peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
F 900 R and Z900 have very similar engine displacement (900 cc vs 900 cc).
Peak power
Z900 has a clear listed power advantage (125 hp vs 105 hp).
Torque
Z900 has a modest listed torque advantage (98.6 Nm vs 92 Nm).
Listed top speed
Z900 has a modest listed top-speed advantage (240 km/h vs 230 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
Z900 has a modest listed weight advantage (212 kg vs 219 kg). F 900 R and Z900 have very similar seat heights (81.5 cm vs 82 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in peak power, torque, listed top speed and weight, while displacement and seat height remain relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of BMW F 900 R vs KAWASAKI Z900?
KAWASAKI Z900 is listed at 240 km/h (149 mph) vs 230 km/h (143 mph) for BMW F 900 R.
Which has more horsepower, BMW F 900 R or KAWASAKI Z900?
KAWASAKI Z900 has 125 hp compared with 105 hp on the BMW F 900 R.
Which is lighter, BMW F 900 R or KAWASAKI Z900?
KAWASAKI Z900 is lighter at 212 kg vs 219 kg for BMW F 900 R.
Which is better, BMW F 900 R or KAWASAKI Z900?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
