CF MOTO 400NK vs BMW G 310 R
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- CF MOTO 400NK 80 cm Tallest seat here
- BMW G 310 R 78.5 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 1.5 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 34 hp (BMW G 310 R) up to 41 hp (CF MOTO 400NK).
- Torque spans 28 Nm (BMW G 310 R) up to 35.4 Nm (CF MOTO 400NK).
- Weight spans 181 kg (BMW G 310 R) to 193 kg (CF MOTO 400NK).
- Displacement spans 300 cc (BMW G 310 R) to 400 cc (CF MOTO 400NK).
Reader votes so far — total 8: CF MOTO 400NK (4); BMW G 310 R (4).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | CF MOTO 400NK | BMW G 310 R |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CF MOTO | BMW |
| Model | CF MOTO 400NK | BMW G 310 R |
| Engine size | 400cc | 300cc |
| Power | 41hp | 34hp |
| Torque | 35.4nm. | 28nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves |
| Weight | 193kg | 181kg |
| Front brake | Dual 300MM discs (ABS) (J.JUAN Calipers) | Single disc, diameter 300 mm, 4-piston fixed caliper, radially bolted |
| Rear brake | 240MM disc (ABS) (J.JUAN Calipers) | Single disc, diameter 240 mm, single-piston floating caliper |
| Seat height (cm) | 80cm | 78.5cm |
| Front tyre | 120/70ZR17 | 110/70 R17 |
| Rear tyre | 160/60ZR17 | 150/60 R17 |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | Inverted fork shocks | Upside down fork, Ø 41 mm |
| Rear suspension | Rebound shock, Monoshock Absorber | Cast aluminium dual swing arm, central spring strut, spring pre-load adjustable |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Naked |
| Top speed | 188km/h | 165km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 17 L – 4.5 L/100km | 11 L – 3.8 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $4000 | $4995 |
| Brand price lists | View CF MOTO price list | View BMW price list |
| Extra features |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 CF MOTO 400NK vs 2023 BMW G 310 R: listed specifications
The 2023 CF MOTO 400NK and 2023 BMW G 310 R differ on the listed specifications: the 400NK has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed, and the G 310 R has a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
400NK has a clearly larger listed engine displacement (400 cc vs 300 cc).
Peak power
400NK has a clear listed power advantage (41 hp vs 34 hp).
Torque
400NK has a clear listed torque advantage (35.4 Nm vs 28 Nm).
Listed top speed
400NK has a clear listed top-speed advantage (188 km/h vs 165 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
G 310 R has a modest listed weight advantage (181 kg vs 193 kg). G 310 R has a lower listed seat height (78.5 cm vs 80 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of CF MOTO 400NK vs BMW G 310 R?
CF MOTO 400NK is listed at 188 km/h (117 mph) vs 165 km/h (103 mph) for BMW G 310 R.
Which has more horsepower, CF MOTO 400NK or BMW G 310 R?
CF MOTO 400NK has 41 hp compared with 34 hp on the BMW G 310 R.
Which is lighter, CF MOTO 400NK or BMW G 310 R?
BMW G 310 R is lighter at 181 kg vs 193 kg for CF MOTO 400NK.
Which is better, CF MOTO 400NK or BMW G 310 R?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
