CF MOTO 800MT SPORT vs 2024 YAMAHA XSR900
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- CF MOTO 800MT SPORT 82.5 cm Tallest seat here
- 2024 YAMAHA XSR900 81 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 1.5 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 95 hp (CF MOTO 800MT SPORT) up to 119 hp (2024 YAMAHA XSR900).
- Torque spans 77 Nm (CF MOTO 800MT SPORT) up to 93 Nm (2024 YAMAHA XSR900).
- Weight spans 193 kg (2024 YAMAHA XSR900) to 231 kg (CF MOTO 800MT SPORT).
- Displacement spans 800 cc (CF MOTO 800MT SPORT) to 900 cc (2024 YAMAHA XSR900).
Reader votes so far — total 3: CF MOTO 800MT SPORT (0); 2024 YAMAHA XSR900 (3).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | CF MOTO 800MT SPORT | YAMAHA XSR900 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CF MOTO | YAMAHA |
| Model | CF MOTO 800MT SPORT | YAMAHA XSR900 |
| Engine size | 800cc | 900cc |
| Power | 95hp | 119hp |
| Torque | 77nm. | 93nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 8 valves | 3 cylinders, 12 valves |
| Weight | 231kg | 193kg |
| Front brake | Dual-disc, J.Juan, radial fixed caliper. 320mm (ABS) | 298mm dual hydraulic discs; ABS |
| Rear brake | Single disc, J.Juan. 260mm (ABS) | 245mm single hydraulic disc; ABS |
| Seat height (cm) | 82.5cm | 81cm |
| Front tyre | 110/80 R19 | 120/70ZR17M/C (58W) Tubeless (Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22) |
| Rear tyre | 150/70 R17 | 180/55ZR17M/C (73W) Tubeless (Bridgestone® Battlax Hypersport S22) |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | KYB upside down. Damping adjustable. | 41mm inverted fork, adjustable preload, compression and rebound; 5.1-in travel |
| Rear suspension | Damping adjustable | Single shock, adjustable preload and rebound damping; 5.4-in travel |
| Motorcycle type | Adventure | Naked |
| Top speed | 230km/h | 250km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 19 L – 6 L/100km | 14 L – 6 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $10799 | $10299 |
| Brand price lists | View CF MOTO price list | View YAMAHA price list |
| Extra features | -CF-SC slipper clutch -7-inch TFT Screen, Power modes. -Cruise control, Cornering ABS. USB+12V DC |
-Ride-by-Wire Throttle with APSG, Assist & Slipper (A&S) Clutch, Six-Axis IMU with Rider Aids, Traction Control System, Slide Control System (SCS), LIFT Control System (LIF), Brake Control System (BC), Full-Color 3.5-inch TFT Display, Up & Down Quick Shift System, Cruise Control |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 CF MOTO 800MT SPORT vs 2024 YAMAHA XSR900: listed specifications
The 2023 CF MOTO 800MT SPORT and 2024 YAMAHA XSR900 differ on the listed specifications: the XSR900 has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
XSR900 has a larger listed engine displacement (900 cc vs 800 cc).
Peak power
XSR900 has a clear listed power advantage (119 hp vs 95 hp).
Torque
XSR900 has a clear listed torque advantage (93 Nm vs 77 Nm).
Listed top speed
XSR900 has a modest listed top-speed advantage (250 km/h vs 230 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
XSR900 is notably lighter on the listed weight (193 kg vs 231 kg). XSR900 has a lower listed seat height (81 cm vs 82.5 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed, weight and seat height.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of CF MOTO 800MT SPORT vs YAMAHA XSR900?
YAMAHA XSR900 is listed at 250 km/h (155 mph) vs 230 km/h (143 mph) for CF MOTO 800MT SPORT.
Which has more horsepower, CF MOTO 800MT SPORT or YAMAHA XSR900?
YAMAHA XSR900 has 119 hp compared with 95 hp on the CF MOTO 800MT SPORT.
Which is lighter, CF MOTO 800MT SPORT or YAMAHA XSR900?
YAMAHA XSR900 is lighter at 193 kg vs 231 kg for CF MOTO 800MT SPORT.
Which is better, CF MOTO 800MT SPORT or YAMAHA XSR900?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
