CF MOTO 800NK vs 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- CF MOTO 800NK 80 cm Lowest seat here
- 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 80.4 cm Tallest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 0.4 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 47 hp (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650) up to 100.8 hp (CF MOTO 800NK).
- Torque spans 52 Nm (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650) up to 81 Nm (CF MOTO 800NK).
- Weight spans 189 kg (CF MOTO 800NK) to 202 kg (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650).
- Displacement spans 650 cc (2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650) to 800 cc (CF MOTO 800NK).
Reader votes so far — total 4: CF MOTO 800NK (4); 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 (0).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | CF MOTO 800NK | Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | CF MOTO | Royal Enfield |
| Model | CF MOTO 800NK | Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 |
| Engine size | 800cc | 650cc |
| Power | 100.8hp | 47hp |
| Torque | 81nm. | 52nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves | Twin cylinder, 8 valves |
| Weight | 189kg | 202kg |
| Front brake | Dual 320mm disc with ABS (J. JUAN Calipers) | 320 mm disc, ABS |
| Rear brake | 260mm disc with ABS (J. JUAN Calipers) | 240 mm disc, ABS |
| Seat height (cm) | 80cm | 80.4cm |
| Front tyre | 120/70 R17 MAXXIS | 100/90-18 M/C 56H |
| Rear tyre | 180/55 R17 MAXXIS | 130/70-R18 M/C 63V/130/70-18 M/C 63H |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | KYB Fully adjustable inverted fork shocks | Telescopic forks |
| Rear suspension | KYB Fully adjustable mono-shock | Twin gas charged shock-absorbers with adjustable preload |
| Motorcycle type | Naked | Commuter |
| Top speed | 260km/h | 202km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 15 L – 6 L/100km | 13.7 L – 5.2 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $8499 | $6799 |
| Brand price lists | View CF MOTO price list | View Royal Enfield price list |
| Extra features | (In collaboration with KTM, using the Duke 790 engine block) -8-inch TFT screen -Voice command feature, smart key, slipper clutch -Traction control, power modes, riding modes, cornering ABS -T-Box, navigation feature, Bluetooth connectivity |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 CF MOTO 800NK vs 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650: listed specifications
The 2023 CF MOTO 800NK and 2024 Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 differ on the listed specifications: the 800NK has more displacement, peak power and torque, and the higher listed top speed and a lower listed weight.
Engine displacement
800NK has a clearly larger listed engine displacement (800 cc vs 650 cc).
Peak power
800NK has a clear listed power advantage (100.8 hp vs 47 hp).
Torque
800NK has a clear listed torque advantage (81 Nm vs 52 Nm).
Listed top speed
800NK has a clear listed top-speed advantage (260 km/h vs 202 km/h).
Cooling
Both motorcycles are listed as liquid-cooled.
Weight and seat height
800NK has a modest listed weight advantage (189 kg vs 202 kg). 800NK and Continental GT 650 have very similar seat heights (80 cm vs 80.4 cm).
Conclusion
The measurable differences are therefore concentrated in displacement, peak power, torque, listed top speed and weight, while seat height remains relatively close.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of CF MOTO 800NK vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
CF MOTO 800NK is listed at 260 km/h (162 mph) vs 202 km/h (126 mph) for Royal Enfield Continental GT 650.
Which has more horsepower, CF MOTO 800NK or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
CF MOTO 800NK has 101 hp compared with 47 hp on the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650.
Which is lighter, CF MOTO 800NK or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
CF MOTO 800NK is lighter at 189 kg vs 202 kg for Royal Enfield Continental GT 650.
Which is better, CF MOTO 800NK or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
