NEXX XR1R Carbon vs HJC RPHA 11

Mark your favourite helmet and vote — results update instantly, no account needed. Sharing your pick helps others deciding between these models.

XR1R Carbon
0

NEXX

Full specs page
RPHA 11
0

HJC

Full specs page

Impact resistance map (legacy four zones)

No verified 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s point data for these records. Legacy four zones are not placed into the three-speed map without a verified speed.

Front
NEXX XR1R Carbon Front
XR1R Carbon
HJC RPHA 11 Front
RPHA 11
Right side
NEXX XR1R Carbon Right side
XR1R Carbon
HJC RPHA 11 Right side
RPHA 11
Rear
NEXX XR1R Carbon Rear
XR1R Carbon
HJC RPHA 11 Rear
RPHA 11
Left side
NEXX XR1R Carbon Left side
XR1R Carbon
HJC RPHA 11 Left side
RPHA 11

Technical specifications

Feature XR1R Carbon RPHA 11
Brand NEXX HJC
Model XR1R Carbon RPHA 11
Product / model code — —
Safety summary SHARP: 3.0 stars SHARP: 3.0 stars
Helmet type Full face Full face
Durability
Weight 1.3 kg 1.3 kg
Size XXS XS S M L XL XXL XXXL XXS XS S M L XL XXL
Listed price (reference) $300 $270
Material Composite fiber Composite fiber
Retention system Double D-Ring Double D-Ring
Certification UN ECE REG 22.05 UN ECE REG 22.05
Shell sizes Multi size Single size
Pinlock ready
Scratch-resistant visor
Quick-release visor
Removable cheek pads
Intercom ready
Ventilation channels
Internal sun visor
Removable liner

Change helmets

Build your helmet comparison

Pick the first two helmets (required). Use Add 3rd helmet for more models, then Add 4th helmet if needed.

More comparisons with these helmets

Browse other rider comparisons, or start a new one with up to four helmets.

All comparisons

Helmet comparison FAQ

NEXX XR1R Carbon vs HJC RPHA 11: what are the main differences?

Looking at the selected models side by side: All listed helmets share the same certification entry: UN ECE REG 22.05. Verified SHARP star ratings in our data: XR1R Carbon: 3.0 SHARP stars; RPHA 11: 3.0 SHARP stars. SHARP is an independent assessment, not a legal certification. These points summarise measurable catalogue fields; fit and real-world comfort still depend on trying the correct size.

Do these helmets have the same safety certification?

XR1R Carbon is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. RPHA 11 is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. On paper they share the same certification entry. ECE 22.05, ECE 22.06 and DOT are legal approval standards; a SHARP star rating (when present) is a separate independent lab assessment and must not be read as the same kind of result. We do not infer SHARP stars from an ECE mark alone. Verified SHARP ratings on this page: XR1R Carbon: 3.0 stars; RPHA 11: 3.0 stars.

What do the colours on the impact zone map mean?

Our map stores regional codes on a 1–6 scale (greener ≈ stronger on this page; brown ≈ weaker). When verified multi-speed SHARP point data is present, you can switch 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s and see front-top, front-lower, rear, left and right separately — missing speeds or points show “no data” and are never filled from another speed. Older records may only have the legacy four zones (front/rear/sides) without a verified speed label; those are not placed into the three-speed map. Zone colours are not the same thing as a SHARP star rating. For the models on this page where the safety source is marked SHARP, zone codes are treated as SHARP-linked map data.

How do these helmets compare in front, rear and side impact tests?

Front, rear, right-side and left-side codes are available for XR1R Carbon and RPHA 11. Across those zones the stored codes look broadly similar. These comparisons use the legacy four-zone fields only; impact speed was not verified for the three-speed map.

Which helmet is lighter, and by how much?

Listed weights: XR1R Carbon: 1.3 kg; RPHA 11: 1.3 kg. They are within about 50 g of each other in our data, so none is meaningfully lighter. Manufacturer weight often varies by shell size.