KTM RC 390 vs KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL
Pick your favourite below and cast your vote — counts update right away and no registration is required. Sharing your choice helps others who read this comparison.
Scores, summary & seat (optional) Estimates and auto text from specs — open if you want them.
Technical score (estimate)
Weighted mix of power, torque, power-to-weight, top speed and lighter weight within this comparison only. Not a real-world verdict — riding style and roads matter.
Usage fit (estimate)
Rough scores for city riding, touring, sporty riding and new riders — mix of specs and bike category. Same caveats as the technical score: traffic, skill and tyres matter.
City / commute
Touring / long rides
Sporty riding
New rider friendly
Seat height (cm)
Figures are as in the database; boots, suspension sag and road surface change how tall the bike feels.
- KTM RC 390 82.5 cm Tallest seat here
- KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL 79.5 cm Lowest seat here
Spread in this comparison: about 3 cm.
Rough guide: comfortable flat-foot reach often needs inseam roughly in the same ballpark as seat height (varies a lot by ergonomics).
Auto summary from specs
Generated from the numbers in the comparison — not a review.
- Power spans 28 hp (KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL) up to 44 hp (KTM RC 390).
- Torque spans 22.6 Nm (KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL) up to 37 Nm (KTM RC 390).
- Weight spans 149 kg (KTM RC 390) to 163 kg (KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL).
- Displacement spans 250 cc (KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL) to 400 cc (KTM RC 390).
All values look the same; turn off the filter.
| Specification | KTM RC 390 | KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | KTM | KAWASAKI |
| Model | KTM RC 390 | KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL |
| Engine size | 400cc | 250cc |
| Power | 44hp | 28hp |
| Torque | 37nm. | 22.6nm. |
| Cylinders / valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves | Single cylinder, 4 valves |
| Weight | 149kg | 163kg |
| Front brake | Four-piston radial fixed calliper, brake disc | Single-sided, dual-piston, single semi-floating ø310 mm petal disc |
| Rear brake | Single-piston floating calliper, brake disc | ø220 mm petal disc, Dual-piston |
| Seat height (cm) | 82.5cm | 79.5cm |
| Front tyre | 110/70 R17 | 110/70-17M/C 54H |
| Rear tyre | 150/60 R17 | 140/70-17M/C 66H |
| Cooling | Liquid cooling | Liquid cooling |
| Front suspension | WP APEX 43 | ø41 mm telescopic fork, 120 mm |
| Rear suspension | WP APEX - Monoshock | Bottom-link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable spring preload, 130 mm |
| Motorcycle type | Supersport | Supersport |
| Top speed | 170km/h | 172km/h |
| Fuel capacity / consumption | 13.7 L – 3.5 L/100km | 14 L – 4 L/100km |
| Service network | ||
| Service quality | ||
| Parts availability | ||
| Price | $7564 | $4000 |
| Brand price lists | View KTM price list | View KAWASAKI price list |
| Extra features | -TFT Display, slipper clutch |
Opinions
You need to vote for a model above before you can leave a short comment. Comments are published after editor approval.
No published opinions yet — you can be the first.
2023 KTM RC 390 vs 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL: Which One is Better for You?
2023 KTM RC 390 and 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL offer comparable performance in terms of engine capacity, but usage preferences and driving styles could influence the choice. Additionally, 2023 KTM RC 390, with its 44hp, stands out for users seeking speed and performance.
1. Cylinder Capacity and Performance
2023 KTM RC 390 and 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL are close in engine capacity. 2023 KTM RC 390, with its 400cc, provides slightly better performance, while 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL, with its 250cc, offers a more economical and balanced option.2023 KTM RC 390, with its 400cc engine capacity, is ideal for users seeking high performance and acceleration. It is ideal for intermediate users in urban areas and short distances.
2. Torque Power
2023 KTM RC 390, with its 37Nm torque, delivers powerful performance. A high torque value ensures superior acceleration and advantage on steep inclines. 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL, with its 22.6Nm torque, offers a more balanced ride for city use. 2023 KTM RC 390 is ideal for users requiring rapid acceleration. This torque value provides economical and sufficient power for city use.
3. Top Speed
2023 KTM RC 390 (Süpersport) and 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL (Süpersport) deliver the same performance with a maximum speed of 170 km/h. In this case, it would be more logical to base your decision on the type of motorcycle and other features rather than speed.
4. Cooling System
2023 KTM RC 390 features a Liquid-Cooled system, while 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL offers a Liquid-Cooled system. Both models deliver equal performance in their cooling systems.
5. Design and Comfort
2023 KTM RC 390 and 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL are close in weight, offering similar experiences for different usage scenarios. Additionally, 2023 KTM RC 390, with a seat height of 82.5cm, is more suitable for taller riders, offering greater comfort.2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL, with a seat height of 79.5cm, provides a more ergonomic ride for average-height riders.
Conclusion
2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL emerges as the winner of this comparison based on total points. 2023 KTM RC 390 and 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL offer comparable performance in terms of engine capacity. 2023 KTM RC 390, with higher torque, excels in rapid acceleration and steep climbs. 2023 KTM RC 390 and 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL deliver identical top speed performance. Both models have similar cooling systems, offering comparable performance for long journeys. In conclusion, 2023 KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL stands out in terms of technical specifications and overall performance. However, depending on your riding preferences and usage needs, both models offer unique advantages.
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of KTM RC 390 vs KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL?
KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL is listed at 172 km/h vs 170 km/h for KTM RC 390.
Which has more horsepower, KTM RC 390 or KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL?
KTM RC 390 has 44 hp compared with 28 hp on the KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL.
Which is better, KTM RC 390 or KAWASAKİ Ninja 250 SL?
It depends on your riding style. Compare top speed, weight, fuel use and price in the table on this page, then vote for the bike you prefer.
Similar comparisons
Other comparisons that share these bikes or were recently added.
