HJC RPHA 11 vs AIROH DRAGON

Mark your favourite helmet and vote — results update instantly, no account needed. Sharing your pick helps others deciding between these models.

Impact resistance map (legacy four zones)

No verified 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s point data for these records. Legacy four zones are not placed into the three-speed map without a verified speed.

Front
HJC RPHA 11 Front
RPHA 11
AIROH DRAGON Front
DRAGON
Right side
HJC RPHA 11 Right side
RPHA 11
AIROH DRAGON Right side
DRAGON
Rear
HJC RPHA 11 Rear
RPHA 11
AIROH DRAGON Rear
DRAGON
Left side
HJC RPHA 11 Left side
RPHA 11
AIROH DRAGON Left side
DRAGON

Technical specifications

Feature RPHA 11 DRAGON
Brand HJC AIROH
Model RPHA 11 DRAGON
Product / model code — —
Safety summary SHARP: 3.0 stars SHARP: 4.0 stars
Helmet type Full face Full face
Durability
Weight 1.3 kg 1.3 kg
Size XXS XS S M L XL XXL S M L XL XXL
Listed price (reference) $270 $144
Material Composite fiber Fiberglass
Retention system Double D-Ring Double D-Ring
Certification UN ECE REG 22.05 UN ECE REG 22.05
Shell sizes Single size Single size
Pinlock ready No Yes
Scratch-resistant visor No Yes
Quick-release visor Yes No
Removable cheek pads Yes No
Intercom ready Yes No
Ventilation channels Yes Yes
Internal sun visor No No
Removable liner Yes Yes

Change helmets

Build your helmet comparison

Pick the first two helmets (required). Use Add 3rd helmet for more models, then Add 4th helmet if needed.

Helmet comparison FAQ

HJC RPHA 11 vs AIROH DRAGON: what are the main differences?

Looking at the selected models side by side: All listed helmets share the same certification entry: UN ECE REG 22.05. Pinlock-ready anti-fog visor support is listed for DRAGON (not all models). Verified SHARP star ratings in our data: RPHA 11: 3.0 SHARP stars; DRAGON: 4.0 SHARP stars. SHARP is an independent assessment, not a legal certification. These points summarise measurable catalogue fields; fit and real-world comfort still depend on trying the correct size.

Do these helmets have the same safety certification?

RPHA 11 is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. DRAGON is listed with UN ECE REG 22.05. On paper they share the same certification entry. ECE 22.05, ECE 22.06 and DOT are legal approval standards; a SHARP star rating (when present) is a separate independent lab assessment and must not be read as the same kind of result. We do not infer SHARP stars from an ECE mark alone. Verified SHARP ratings on this page: RPHA 11: 3.0 stars; DRAGON: 4.0 stars.

What do the colours on the impact zone map mean?

Our map stores regional codes on a 1–6 scale (greener ≈ stronger on this page; brown ≈ weaker). When verified multi-speed SHARP point data is present, you can switch 6 / 7.5 / 8.5 m/s and see front-top, front-lower, rear, left and right separately — missing speeds or points show “no data” and are never filled from another speed. Older records may only have the legacy four zones (front/rear/sides) without a verified speed label; those are not placed into the three-speed map. Zone colours are not the same thing as a SHARP star rating. For the models on this page where the safety source is marked SHARP, zone codes are treated as SHARP-linked map data.

How do these helmets compare in front, rear and side impact tests?

Comparing the stored legacy zone codes: at the front, RPHA 11 maps stronger while DRAGON maps weaker; at the rear, RPHA 11 maps stronger while DRAGON maps weaker; at the right side, DRAGON maps mid while RPHA 11 maps weaker. These comparisons use the legacy four-zone fields only; impact speed was not verified for the three-speed map.

Which helmet is lighter, and by how much?

Listed weights: RPHA 11: 1.3 kg; DRAGON: 1.3 kg. They are within about 50 g of each other in our data, so none is meaningfully lighter. Manufacturer weight often varies by shell size.

Which helmets support Pinlock or have an internal sun visor?

Pinlock-ready anti-fog visor support is marked for DRAGON (ready/compatible in our catalogue — not “insert included in the box” unless the retailer says so); not marked for RPHA 11.